The Ajusco case,based on twenty months of fieldwork completed over the course of a decade(1983-1993),documents the dynamics of community mobilization and the interactive politics of environmental regulation and popular resistance around ecological and land use issues.The case links the urban land question and the concept of sustainability to questions about livelihood opportunities and political mediation.The study advances one of the key arguments stressed during the 1992 World Conference on Environment and Development(Earth Summit) and the 1996 City Summit(Habitat Ⅱ): rising demands for healthy human settlements—including adequate housing,jobs,food,water,social justice,and equity—must be reconciled with the necessity to sustain the ecological foundations of life and industry.The Mexico City case clearly shows that efforts to meet such a far-reaching challenge must go beyond issues of urban management.Bottom-up pressure must be brought against the state so that planning for ecological sustainability can take into account the fact that human settlements are increasingly places for production and income generation as well as a places for consumption and reproduction.This challenge calls for community empowerment and,ultimately,for integrated approaches to sustainable development in urban and rural areas simultaneously—not just in the Valley of Mexco,but regionally and around the world.
热心网友
Ajusco 事例, 根据二十个月fieldwork 完成在路线 decade(1983-1993), 提供社区动员动力学并且环境章程交互式政治 和普遍的抵抗在生态学和土地利用issues。The 案件附近连接都市土 地问题并且sustainability 的概念对问题关于生计机会和政治 mediation。The 研究提出关键论据的当中一个注重在关于环境的 1992 年其间世界会议和Development(Earth 山顶) 和1996 年城市 Summit(Habitat 。2o): 上升要求为健康人 settlements。。including 充分住房, 工作, 食物, 水, 社会正义 , 并且equity。。must 被和解与必要承受生活的生态学基础并且 industry。The 墨西哥城案件展示努力接受这样一广远挑战必须超出 都市management。Bottom-up 压力问题范围必须清楚地被带来反对这 个状态所以计划为生态学sustainability 可能考虑到这个事实人 解决愈来愈是地方为生产和收入世代并且地方为消耗量和 reproduction。This 挑战呼号对社区empowerment 和, 最后, 对集 成方法对能承受发展在都市和乡区simultaneously。。not 在Mexco 谷,。